frizz_ease ([info]frizz_ease) wrote,
@ 2008-04-08 15:31:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Can you tell I'm feeling better???
Okay time for a rant....

 In 1981 I decided to become a  teacher.  I went off to college to "become" a teacher.  After one semester I was frustrated.  I wanted to learn about how a child's brain worked, how to integrate learning and experience and how to make learning meaningful.  These courses were not offered in the education department.  (They were provided in the psychology department.  And all of these coursed were considered electives).  The emphasis in my program was how to teach groups of children ...not how an individual child learns.  Oh but I learned plenty about diversity in the classroom, social foundations in American education and how to design a damn good felt board.

Fast forward to 1999, I send my child to public school.  I discovered that nothing had changed.  Teachers still knew nothing about brain development and meaningful learning.  (But hey, now instead of felt boards they had computers). Teachers would tell me that my son had to complete very specific tasks at very specific times during each school year.  I would ask why?  They would tell me about the curriculum standards.  I would ask questions about learning readiness (basic to brain research).  They would stare at me blankly.  It was clear that they didn't know what the research said.  I would ask if it was even developmentally appropriate to ask a 6/7/8 year old to be able to master all of these very specific steps  in the kindergarten/1st/2nd grade curriculum?  Again the blank stares.   I even became PTA president at my child's school, hoping to facilitate some change.  I went to school meetings and district functions, begging the schools to emphasize learning in real world contexts instead of sets of abstract standards on a checklist.  I wrote letters to the superintendent talking about programs that work.  Where collaborative and cooperative learning is stressed.  Where authentic assessments are used, giving feedback about learning and not letter grades.  I was thanked and dismissed at every turn.

So now I is 2008.  I am homeschooling and have been happily educating my children for six years.  I am NOW able to be the teacher I have always wanted to be.  To have my child learn the way their brains were designed to learn.  To create an environment where learning has meaning...because without construction of meaning, there is no leaning!

So today, I read an article about the dropout rate in urban schools, "The dropout rate of more than a million students each year 'is not just a crisis; this is a catastrophe,' said former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, founding chairman of America's Promise Alliance, which presented the research."  The Alliance seemed shocked at this "crisis".  But I'm not.  Urban students are saying what I said in 1981 and again in 1999 and still in 2008, students need an environment where leaning is meaningful.  There is no meaning in current high schools for a majority of urban students. 

So what is the solution?  Students are leaving the schools in record numbers.  I would think their voices are  loud and clear.  A program designed with no meaning for the student is viewed as valueless and a waste.  But if our leaders couldn't figure this out, well then why not ask the students themselves?  That's right, let's ask the customer why they no longer desire the product being sold to them.  ASK students why they are leaving!!!!  Exit interviews...hmmm that makes sense right?  "The alliance announced plans for 'dropout prevention' summits in every state over the next two years, bringing community, school and business leaders together 'to develop workable solution and action plans for improving our nation's alarming graduation rates.'    *Head thumps on desk*  I give up.


(Post a new comment)


[info]fairiedust1975
2008-04-08 09:45 pm UTC (link)
I ended up getting a degree in education. I do remember the frustration in exactly what you are saying. We are simply not a society set up for dealing with children on an individual level. We educate the masses. We have made enormous strides (compared to 30 years ago) in tailoring specific education plans for specific children (according to special needs) under the umbrella of Special Education. However, the idea that a significant portion of the children in todays society are not going to learn material the way its presented, that's just an unpleasant fact. I admire the efforts you have made, but I can see why you are getting the resistance. You are talking about revamping the entire way that teachers teach.

And as far as the alarming rate of drop outs in high school, it's possible to think these kids dropped out because they're not learning, but it's also very much the case that they don't even know how to hope for better than what their parents have. We educate the masses. As a country, we have a lot of social problems. I personally believe those are what you are seeing reflected in the drop out rates.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]frizz_ease
2008-04-08 10:06 pm UTC (link)
The drop our rate is increasing in urban centers but not in suburban setting...those graduation rates are increasing. I feel that we are losing urban students because there is no value on the education they are receiving (of course there are a multitude of factors facing urban youth). It just frustrates me that we will deal with this by having committees meet for the next TWO YEARS and not do exit interviews the way ANY OTHER business would do.

Yes I do expect a revamping of education...the model is exactly as it was in the 1800's. I'm wondering when the revamping will take place???

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]brgk44
2008-04-10 02:41 am UTC (link)
Woo hoo! So good to have you back :)

I'm still too close to the public school mess in this area and am still very bitter about our experience, so I am not able to say anything constructive at this time.

I agree wholeheartedly that the entire system needs an overhaul, but I wouldn't even begin to know how to implement that kind of change in a way that wouldn't completely mess up the kids that would be forced to switch mid-stream. Phase-outs are usually a mess. Also, I think almost all teachers would be forced to go through training for anything like that and that would likely meet serious resistance.

*sigh* I dunno. It's why we do what we do.

(Reply to this)


[info]brgk44
2008-04-10 11:27 am UTC (link)
Have you read "How Children Fail" by John Holt?

I got it from the library last night and within 3 pages, I thought "I know who else might like this!" :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]frizz_ease
2008-04-10 11:36 am UTC (link)
I have read just about everything from Holt. I have also read just about everything from John Taylor-Gatto. They are both incredible! Check out: http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]brgk44
2008-04-10 12:26 pm UTC (link)
I *just* wrote down the titles of a few books by John Taylor-Gatto to look for at the library--any suggestions on which to read first?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]frizz_ease
2008-04-10 02:59 pm UTC (link)
I love all his stuff...check out the link and it will give you info about his books and you can chose what sounds interesting...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…